Leadership training: troops and "Common Information Effect"

So, you're a team meeting, and if a lot on your plate. What should you do? Many timetable set out in the current point of view and to share information on individuals. Unfortunately, this is a very problematic assumptions.

Research has shown that a number of issues in advance polling (which is doing what no clear timetable for the establishment of meeting points). Whoever is first to have the "upper hand", and the one who speaks somewhere in the middle of the meeting will be a significant disadvantage when it comes to memory with regard to the principles. The primacy and recency effect dictates that this information is the most discussed simply because you remember them better.

In addition, information which various individuals generally accepted in general often discussed. Contrary to popular belief, teams tend to share information based on what the joint . The bias is information that has been shared quite large. The irony is to form a group of the diversity and breadth of information that is trapped not cease to discuss what they already know. But common sense is not borne out in the research. Teams that do not have the right communication strategies cease any known problems in the public mind – we all tend to discuss things in common, and tend to gloss over or leave important information that should be discussed with one single member of the team ignored.

Usually you deal with this if you are aware of the processes that help to overcome such biases.

  • Log Data . You should be someone who is a good tracker information so that the information discussed topics that have been discussed.
  • share Time information . It will be important to keep track of information that is common and assign the time
  • The use of visual information . Research shows that visual information shared thus help teams build mental models and are better ( Rentsch, Delis, Salas & Letsky, 2010 ).
  • Diversion unique information as part of the whole . You do not want to just into the trap of discussing any specific information. You still want this information to get enough playing time and connect the available knowledge.
  • The fact that the team's goal is to separate the creative thinking and convergent achieve results . On the one hand, individuals work better when brainstorming. On the other hand, the teams perform much better than individuals when it comes to decisions. Always keep the two functions into the overall workflow.

Ironically, this information is not only able to help teams. There is a need for an integrated approach to the design team working on a variety of individuals in the team, while in the midst of creating opportunities for group learning there is a unique team culture within the organization. There is certainly not one size fits all solution, but there is evidence that you can get a decent education team involved in their design and structure that are directed towards performance.

Source by Stuart Tan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *